🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: officer-worn camera recordings. Faces of victims, observers and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or flashlights as the police arrive, their expressions and tones eloquent of wariness or panic or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often incidentally glimpse the faces of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what sometimes seems like extraordinary diffidence – though perhaps this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have previously seen the Netflix real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose main point of interest was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of body cam film. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids allegedly harassed and antagonized her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, the accused fatally shot Owens through her locked door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Investigation and State Laws

The investigating authorities found proof that the suspect had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit residents and others to shoot if there is a significant presumption of danger. The movie constructs its narrative with the body cam footage captured during the repeated police visits to the location before the killing, and then at the disturbing and disordered incident site itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of the caller calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really imply anything too complicated about the neighbor, or any extenuating circumstance. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an hurtful taunt. The production is showcased as an example of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking bloodshed. But the fact of gun ownership and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit famously claimed made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Police Interrogation and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how minimal concern the police took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in footage that were not included). Or is gun ownership so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her neighbors a extended period, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was finally formally arrested in the holding cell, there is an extraordinary sequence in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the handcuffs, not aggressively, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is revealed in the end titles. A very sombre picture of U.S. justice and consequences.